Where Every Scroll is a New Adventure
Markiplier Fandom - Blog Posts
ME T O O
Me: I hate the actor! He desver every bit of pain and suffering ever. He doesn’t deserve love
Actor: captain I’m tried
(Cue the wkm music and tears for him)
Me: *cry* oh baby don’t cry! You deserve everything
I did a thing
I was trying to draw Markiplier in some image I found. It's not my best work but it is better than the portrait I was doing of my friend for Art & Design Foundations so I'll take it lol
Please ignore the hand it's bad
Wilford can rizz the fuck outta anyone whenever he wants, no constructive criticism on this post specifically please/j
Fun Facts:
Anti’s first canon appearance was October 10, 2016
The first episode of SanderSides came out October 19, 2016
And A date with Markiplier came out Febuary 14, 2017 (Valentine's day)
Meaning all of these great series came out days (or months) apart from each other! Isn’t that cool?!
Markiplier egos: The Canon and Uncanon
I have come to a horrible realization that you can tell which Sides/Egos are canon for the other series I like, but not for this one! So, of course, I’m gonna fix this. (Also I’m doing this based of characters that do and don’t appear in the ‘with Markiplier’ series canon)
(For the mark section, C - Canon, N - Not Canon, P - Possibly Canon)
The obviously canon
Darkiplier (Also Damien)
Wilford (Also William b. Barnum)
Mark (The actor)
The Jims (all of them, but I’m going to count the four iterations of Jim we see for simplicity's sake)
Yancy
Captain Magnum
Illinois
Stan Wheeler
Heehoo
Murdock (I considered putting him in the “that's just mark” category)
The door monster
Canon?
Bingiplier (plus mini bing)
Googleplier (all four iterations)
Bim Trimmer
King of the squirrels
Dr. Iplier
Ed Edgar
Septiplier (I know)
Silver shepherd
The host (also the author)
That's just Mark
Heist Mark (c)
Head Engineer Mark(c)
Date Mark(c)
Drowned man Mark(n)
E-boy Mark(n)
Noir Mark (c)
The pornipliers (all six of them) (c)
Markbop (p)
Organization Head Mark (c)
Head soldier Mark (c)
Camp counselor Mark (c)
Bomb diffuser Mark (c)
Resident enis Mark (n)
FNAF the Musical Mark (n)
Cool patrol Mark (n)
Old man Mark (c)
Not canon
Harold B. Darrensworth
Eric Derekson
Derek Derekson
Randall Vorhees
Santaplier
Bonesaw
Chef iplier
Yandereplier
Dr. Plier (different from Dr. Iplier)
Dave Torres
Annus
The MerMer
Stan the water man (?)
The God of night
FNAF AR announcer
The necromancer
The centaur
Bill
Elder Jerimiah
Brian
If we add up all of these egos, we get 46 egos in canon, 72 egos in total... Tell me if I missed any (or if there are some that shouldn’t be counted) and I’ll add them to (or remove them from) the list!
If this helps anyone, here's the way I think of it:
It goes who killed Markiplier, wilford motherlovin warfstache, Damien, Markiplier tv, a heist with Markiplier, a date with Markiplier
Because iswm constantly hops between different times, it has existed at all of these moments in history at once. That's why D!Mark asks us on a second date, that's why we visit Yancy in prison and find out he tried out for parole, and that's why we seemingly hop from place to place even before we get to any of those points. All because of the warp crystal.
It's also why Dark talks to us in ahwm, because he can now teleport to wherever he wants at any time he wants. Sorry if this was long but I hope it helped <3
I guess what i find so frustrating is that the markiplier cinematic universe feels like the fnaf lore and it could be easily explained that the reason that it doesn’t matter where ahwm,adwm, and iswm is because none of this is real because the house is putting you into this purgatory of stories to leave you to rot into eternity but thats not canon just some shit i made up
Like none of this makes sense and thats the point of it from a STORY point but from a storyline perspective its confusing as hell
Only difference is that fnaf is supported to be in chronological order and the Mcu is supposed to not have a timeline
You see my dilemma
Cursed thought: The “I got the titties, she got the ass” trend on tiktok but it's Wilford and Remus
WHO KEEPS MAKING THESE ARTICLES?!?!?!
"He got that dog in him"
The dog in him:
I'm always gonna reblog this!
Behold, what happens when @markiplier meets Hamilton
i cant believe this gonna be my first contribution to the fandom and tumblr.
haii 👋🏼👋🏼
there is reference and clearer version below (:
@therealjacksepticeye @markiplier @dantdmofficial @spunketpunk @spicydanhowell @fear-is-nameless Hello guys I want to tell you that on the 23rd of March 2019 everywhere in the Europe people will go on the streets and protest against articles 11 and 13 of Copyright reform. So I beg you if you have time and are for the free internet try to go to protest to save your internet. All details about protests you can find on
After a long time I decided to draw another Darkiplier. I hope that you will like it @markiplier
#Saveyourinternet
The European Commission and the European Parliament really disappointed me and I'm sure that I'm not alone. Because they are saying that they are trying to protect smaller authors and creators in the Europe, but in fact their current version of the article 13 could destroy thousands of them. Yes, I know the article 13 should protect film studios, musicians, writers and others artists from the illegal distribution of their works. So for an example there shouldn't be web sides where is a possibility to download movies, songs, books or another artistic works for free, because that's illegal. There should be only web sides, which have a contract with the company or directly an artist who own mentioned product and I agree with this. But what about our youtubers a lot of them could be destroyed and why? Just because of the current version of the article 13 doesn't think about exceptions. Thousands of people across the Europe could lose their jobs, because of this. The article 13 says that people can't work with things, which they didn't create. But what about "let's players", because they didn't create games, which they are playing. But when we think about that they aren't doing anything wrong or illegal, because they bought games or got them from developers. When we're watching "Let's plays or gaming video" from "gamer" we can hear him/her to talk about the game quality. In fact by playing and talking about games they make an advertising to the developers and gaming industry. So I think that there should be a better definition for them. Another category are reaction videos or reviews, because there could be some troubles too so there are another missing definitions. The same problem is with tutorials, educational videos or various types of compilations, because there we need some definitions as well. And finaly special categories like parodies, covers or karaoke which should have some special rules. Right now the Article 13 is so poorly defined that it's in conflict with freedom of an expression and human rights. So I hope that together with EU we will find a solution that will be good for everyone.